News & Events

Did You Know?

BOP NEWSLETTER • June 2025

Did you know that a recent federal court decision may require Pennsylvania employers to pay employees for walking to the time clock?

In Davis v. Target Corp., the federal court ruled that time spent by employees walking from the worksite entrance to the time clock to clock in for their shift is compensable time. This decision made clear that the Pennsylvania wage law does not follow federal law. For more details, click here.

We urge you to make any necessary adjustments to your pay practices to ensure compliance.

Did you know New Jersey treats commissions as wages?

In Musker v. Suuchi, Inc., the New Jersey Supreme Court addressed whether commissions are considered “wages” under New Jersey’s Wage Payment Law (NJWPL) after a salaried employee sued her employer for allegedly withholding earned commissions in violation of the NJWPL.

This ruling means employers must treat commissions with the same care and compliance as salaries or hourly pay, including taking steps to ensure proper calculation, complying with required payment schedules, and providing and maintaining appropriate documentation. Nonpayment or late payment of earned commissions exposes employers to potential wage claims or even class or collective-action lawsuits where employees may be able to recover lost wages, statutory penalties, and attorneys’ fees. This ruling increases litigation risk for employers with poorly defined or inconsistently applied commission policies, even when there is no ill intent.

Did you know Washington lawmakers will soon provide employers some relief for job posting noncompliance?

Since January 1, 2023, Washington’s Equal Pay and Opportunity Act has required that employers ensure their job postings include the “wage scale or salary range and general description of benefits and other compensation” to promote pay transparency as one way to combat pay inequity. 

Starting July 27, state law will provide a grace period to correct violations, limit the amount of damages that applicants and workers can receive if violations are found, and offer additional flexibility to comply with the law. 

While employers still must include certain compensation disclosures in their job postings or face monetary liability, the new version of the law clarifies the following:

  • Fixed rates are okay. If an employer offers a “fixed wage amount” for the job opening, there is no need to disclose a scale or range.
  • Scraped postings. A job “posting” does not include third-party reposts of the posting (e.g., Indeed or ZipRecruiter) if made without the employer’s consent. This process is also called “scraping.”
  • 5-day grace period. Until July 27, 2027, when another amendment is anticipated, employers must be afforded an opportunity to correct any postings before a lawsuit can be filed or Labor & Industries can pursue penalties. An employer has five business days to make corrections after receiving notice from “any person.”
  • Applicant’s recoverable damages. Clarifying the ambiguity whether $5,000 is a minimum recovery for each “applicant,” the amendment expressly states that an applicant may recover between $100 and $5,000 based on factors weighed by the court. These include whether the violation was willful or a repeat violation, the employer’s size, and what amount is “necessary to deter future noncompliance.” Functionally, plaintiffs will recover far less than $5,000 each unless these factors weigh in favor of a greater award.